|
Post by AstralFire on Jul 15, 2005 20:00:29 GMT -5
Who is it? The apathetic, self-centered Aeolus? The tragic Alexis? The ambitious Echo? Bossy Nemean? Self-assured Helena? Or are the three we know nothing about, absolutely awesome?
|
|
Oatway
The Postless Ones
What fools these mortals be.
Posts: 0
|
Post by Oatway on Jul 15, 2005 20:26:12 GMT -5
Helena. Can't go wrong with the psycho-woman from hell, who derives pleasure from making those who scorned her the basest, most trivial of her posessions. If that doesn't scream, sick, twisted and awesome, I don't want to know what does.
|
|
|
Post by Zuki on Jul 16, 2005 13:14:16 GMT -5
Echo. Her power is most funky. Her codename is funky. She has personallity. Her title is Reluctant Dragon, and I dig dragons.
But most of all, because I helped create the first Leslie Adams Stone.
Echo is kickass. And as the muse and girlfriend of the author, I know some of the kicass things she'll be doing in the future....
Hee he hee hee heeee!
~^,=,^~
But I really do like Alexis too. That wacky Bathrobe NInja.
|
|
Oatway
The Postless Ones
What fools these mortals be.
Posts: 0
|
Post by Oatway on Jul 20, 2005 12:24:41 GMT -5
Now, this I realised upon my first perusal of the choices; T'aechong is not on the list, as he is not an agent. He definitely wins my vote for the most interesting character; his channels of logic are as harsh and emotionless as they come; and he lets nothing get between him and his final goal. He does not deal in absolutes so much as he deals with a very calculated and harshly realistic world.
|
|
|
Post by AstralFire on Jul 20, 2005 15:53:26 GMT -5
When I initially wrote in Yi T'aechong, I didn't expect he'd be so liked.
|
|
Oatway
The Postless Ones
What fools these mortals be.
Posts: 0
|
Post by Oatway on Sept 10, 2005 17:48:11 GMT -5
What's not to love about him? He may be a bit stuffy, but he gets the job done, to the best of his ability. He knows what he must do, and tries to not let innocents be harmed, but he also won't let them stop him entirely. I think he is a good character, simply because he is so rigid and easily hated. The same type of thing happens with Helena; she does some of the most heinous acts imaginable, and yet, she is so very interesting in her delusions that she comes off as lovable.
|
|